Carousel_Arrow Chat icon_cookie IHT_trust_wills IR35 Combined Shape 2 Group 10 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile Group 9 VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Group 7 grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation YouTube
Markel Insurances

22 Mar 2021

The Supreme Court rules that care workers on ‘sleep in’ shifts are not entitled to receive the National Minimum Wage for the whole shift

The Supreme Court delivered its much-anticipated judgment on 19 March 2021 in the case of Tomlinson-Blake v Mencap. In this long running case, the Supreme Court was required to consider whether ‘sleep-in time’ should be classified as working time for the purposes of National Minimum Wage regulations and therefore require each hour spent on a sleep-in shift whether awake or asleep to be paid at the National Minimum Wage rate.

The Claimant in the case (Claire Tomlinson-Blake) was a care worker employed by Mencap to support vulnerable adults with severe learning disabilities to live as independently as possible in their privately-owned home. She worked overnight ‘sleep-ins’ for which she was paid a flat rate of £29.05 for an eight-hour shift. The Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that she was ‘working’ for the purposes of the National Minimum Wage legislation and this meant she had been underpaid because all her ‘sleep-in’ hours should have counted as ‘time work’. The Court of Appeal overturned this decision and decided she was not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on ‘sleep-in’ shifts. The Claimant appealed, but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.

The Supreme Court has ruled, in interpreting the application of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015, that sleep-in care workers are only entitled to be paid the National Minimum Wage when they are awake on shift for the purposes of working, not when they are permitted to sleep. The Supreme Court has determined that if a worker is actually called on to respond to someone's care needs (or any other duties) when on a shift, then that time will count as 'time work' and be subject to the National Minimum Wage i.e. only the time that they are actually awake and working, rather than when sleeping on shift.

Whilst Mencap is now continuing to pay sleep-in shifts at a higher rate, in response to the Supreme Court ruling in their favour, Mencap has stated that they contested this case because of the devastating unfunded back pay liabilities facing providers across the sector, which was estimated at £400 million. Mencap went on to state that “Sleep-ins are a statutory care service which should be funded by Local Authorities, and ultimately Government. It is no exaggeration to say that if the ruling had been different, it would have severely impacted on a sector which is already underfunded and stretched to breaking point. Some providers would have gone bust and, ultimately, the people who rely on care would have suffered”. Mencap has called for Government reform of the legislation covering sleep-in payments as part of a review of the social care workforce so that social care workers can be ‘paid better’.   

It is important to note that the Supreme Court judgment only relates to the scope of ‘work’ for National Minimum Wage purposes. The meaning of ‘work’ for the purposes of entitlement to rest breaks under the Working Time Regulations is subject to different legislation and caselaw, meaning that a person on a sleep in shift at their workplace who has to respond to emergencies or other duties is engaged in working time for the purpose of entitlement to rest breaks. 

Whilst care providers who pay National Minimum Wage rates for sleep-in shifts may be considering reducing wages for sleep-in shifts to below the National Minimum Wage rate in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, care providers cannot simply cut existing care workers’ pay for sleep-in shifts without the risk of unlawful deductions of wages and breach of contract/constructive dismissal claims (as well as damage to employee relations). Any change in contractual terms require employer/employee consultation and must be carried out in accordance with contract and employment law considerations.    

For more information on what’s been discussed in this article or for general employment law advice, please contact Hannah Thomas or call us on 0371 705 4006.

Next article in series

12 Mar 2021

Insurance Times: Markel UK crowned three time champion