Carousel_Arrow Chat icon_cookie IHT_trust_wills IR35 Combined Shape 2 Group 10 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile Group 9 VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Group 7 grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation
Markel Insurance

22 May 2019

Innocent mistake is no excuse for failure to pay ICO fee

Data controllers are required to pay a charge to the Information Commissioner (IC) unless they are exempt. The Data Protection (Charged and Information) Regulations 2018 provide 3 tiers for payment. Read our blog to find out why a well-known paint supplier was fined £4,000 by the IC.

Data controllers are required to pay a charge to the Information Commissioner’s Office unless they are exempt.

The cost of your data protection fee depends on your size and turnover. There are three tiers of fee ranging from £40 and £2,900, but for most organisations it will be £40 or £60.
Some organisations for example charities and small occupational pension schemes only pay £40 regardless of their size and turnover.

You can use the free fee-assessment tool on the Information Commissioner’s Office website to find out if and how much you will need to pay.

The Information Commissioner has recently being issuing fines to data controllers for their failure to pay the relevant fees, where relevant.

In a recent case, the IC issued a £4,000 fixed penalty to Farrow and Ball, a well-known paint supplier, for a failure to pay the relevant tier 3 data protection fee of £2,900.

Farrow and Ball appealed the decision on the basis that its failure to pay was an innocent mistake. It argued that the IC's reminder was sent while the relevant Farrow and Ball individual was on holiday. As a result the reminder was not identified as important internally. The fee was promptly paid once the default was discovered.

The matter progressed to tribunal and it found that Farrow and Ball had not provided a reasonable excuse for non-compliance. The tribunal concluded that a reasonable controller would have systems in place to comply with the 2018 Regulations and there was no particular difficulty which explained their departure from the expected standards of a reasonable controller. The tribunal confirmed there was no evidence of financial hardship or other reason for the IC's discretion to be exercised differently.

The appeal was dismissed.

You can read the full case summary here.
Tagged Legal Expenses Insurance
Next article in series

22 May 2019

Failure to recognise disability on appeal, meant dismissal was discriminatory

A recent employment appeal tribunal case found that a dismissal was discriminatory, although the employer did not know the employee was disabled until the appeal hearing. Read our blog here to find out more.