Carousel_Arrow Chat IHT_trust_wills IR35 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Go grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation
icon_cookie Created with Sketch. Cookies

We use cookies on this website. You can choose to accept them all or to opt out of some. You can change your consent at any time by opening this window again

This includes all necessary technical and session cookies, plus performance, tracking and persistent cookies.

If you choose this option, we will block all performance, targeting and persistent cookies. Many parts of this site will then not work.

Please read the full details in our Cookie Statement.
Markel Insurance

22 May 2019

Failure to recognise disability on appeal, meant dismissal was discriminatory

A recent employment appeal tribunal case found that a dismissal was discriminatory, although the employer did not know the employee was disabled until the appeal hearing. Read our blog here to find out more.

In a recent case, the Claimant was employed as a support worker for a housing association which provided housing for vulnerable young people. She was dismissed at the end of her probationary period on the basis of poor performance, breach of professional boundaries by loaning a service user money without authorisation, breach of the service users’ data protection and poor communication with her colleagues. She appealed her dismissal. During the appeal hearing she raised the fact that she was suffering from depression, which could have influenced her behaviour towards her colleagues and affected her judgement. In particular, she stated that she could respond aggressively to others while suffering from a depressive episode. She also said that such an episode could affect her short-term memory, which may have been relevant to the concerns about her performance. Her appeal was rejected. The employee brought a claim of disability discrimination in the employment tribunal. She claimed, among other things, that she had been subject to disability related discrimination when the employer decided to dismiss her due to behaviour which was a consequence of her disability.

The employment tribunal dismissed her claim on the basis that her employer did not and could not have known about her disability at the time it dismissed her.  The Claimant appealed. The question before the employment appeal tribunal (EAT) was whether the employer knew, or could reasonably have been expected to know that she had a disability before her appeal against her dismissal was rejected.  The EAT upheld her claim on the basis that the internal appeal formed part of the dismissal process.  The employer’s knowledge at the appeal stage of the disciplinary proceedings was therefore relevant and should have been considered by the employment tribunal. It found it was sufficient for the behaviour, which was labelled as ‘misconduct’ by the employer but which in fact was found to be a consequence of her disability, to have a ‘material influence’ on the decision to dismiss, for the dismissal to be discriminatory.  The fact that there may have been other reasons for the dismissal was not an acceptable defence to the claim.

This decision confirms that the appeal stage is part of the dismissal process.  This means that, new evidence that arises on appeal (that was not known at the time the decision to dismiss was made) may make an otherwise fair dismissal, unfair or even discriminatory, if the new evidence is not taken into account when reviewing the original decision to dismiss at the appeal stage. 

Tagged Legal Expenses Insurance
Next article in series

22 May 2019

Dismissal for comments on social media fair, but wrongful

A reminder that where misconduct is not sufficiently serious to constitute gross misconduct, notice pay is due. Read our blog here to find out more.