Carousel_Arrow Chat icon_cookie IHT_trust_wills IR35 Combined Shape 2 Group 10 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile Group 9 VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Group 7 grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation
Markel Insurance

22 May 2019

Dismissal for comments on social media fair, but wrongful

A reminder that where misconduct is not sufficiently serious to constitute gross misconduct, notice pay is due. Read our blog here to find out more.

A dismissal may be wrongful, if it is made in breach of contract e.g. without paying any notice pay that is due.  Where misconduct is sufficiently serious that it constitutes gross misconduct, the employer is entitled to dismiss the employee summarily i.e. without paying notice pay. 

In a recent case, the employment tribunal held that the dismissal of an employee for posting negative comments on social media regarding their employer was fair, but due to the tribunal finding that the misconduct did not constitute gross misconduct, it awarded the employee a sum equivalent to the notice pay they should have received at the time of their dismissal. 

In this case, the employer had a practice of giving a discretionary Christmas bonus gift to its employees.  Due to financial restraints, it reverted to giving staff a bottle of alcohol as a Christmas gift. The Claimant and another employee complained about this in the workplace.  Additionally, the Claimant posted on his colleague’s Facebook page comments (among others), that, “He [the managing manager] spends a few grand on a new dog, then we get told ‘no bonus this year’ but we can have a bottle!!!” and in a later post again, “well, he can stick his bottle where the sun doesn’t shine because I refuse to be insulted in this way!!!”. Following an investigation, the employer dismissed the employee on the basis of the derogatory comments made on his colleague’s Facebook page regarding the managing director. 

The employee brought a claim for unfair dismissal and for wrongful dismissal (i.e. breach of contract) in respect of the decision to dismiss and to dismiss without notice pay.  The employment tribunal decided that the dismissal was fair in that the Claimant admitted the derogatory comments made on Facebook regarding the managing director and that, given the employer was a small company, the Christian name of the managing director could identify the managing director of the company to anyone who viewed the posting on the colleague’s site and knew the company.  However, the tribunal doubted that the misconduct was as serious as the employer viewed it to be, given that the Claimant was merely accusing the managing director of “penny-pinching’’ and scrooge-like behaviour. For this reason, the tribunal determined that there were insufficient grounds for a gross misconduct dismissal and so awarded the Claimant a sum of just over £5,000 in respect of the notice pay he should have received. 
Tagged Legal Expenses Insurance
Next article in series

22 May 2019

Failure to recognise disability on appeal, meant dismissal was discriminatory

A recent employment appeal tribunal case found that a dismissal was discriminatory, although the employer did not know the employee was disabled until the appeal hearing. Read our blog here to find out more.