Carousel_Arrow Chat icon_cookie IHT_trust_wills IR35 Combined Shape 2 Group 10 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile Group 9 VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Group 7 grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation YouTube
Markel Insurances

22 Jan 2021

Announcement for non-damage business interruption policyholders only

*Announcement: Updated 22nd January 2021*

The Supreme Court has now delivered its judgment in the FCA Test Case.  A copy of the judgment can be found here.

Whilst Markel was not a party to the Test Case, we are considering the judgment and its impact on our business interruption claims.  We will remain committed to contacting  all of our customers who have submitted a claim and/or a complaint where the outcome may have been impacted by the Test Case in which case we will write to you to explain the next steps and deal with the questions that you may have.

For further information and updates, please refer to the FCA website.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and insurers consider that this uncertainty needs to be resolved as quickly as possible.  As such, a test case is being taken to court to be conducted throughout the course of June and July 2020.  A key objective in conducting this test case is to obtain court declarations to try and resolve the uncertainty around the validity of many non-damage business interruption (BI) claims.

Non-damage BI is for losses when there is no physical damage to your business premises, and could also cover other exposures that could disrupt your business operations.  For example, as in the case of Covid-19, possible closures due to disease in the vicinity of the premises and/or closure due to government or local authority actions.  If you have purchased this type of cover, this will usually be shown in your Insurance Policy Schedule (and the policy wording will outline the terms and conditions of the cover you may have).  

The result of the test case will be legally binding on the insurers that are parties to the test case in respect of the interpretation of the sample of policy wordings considered by the court.  Markel was not chosen to be a party in the test case; however, the result will provide persuasive guidance for the interpretation of similar policy wordings and claims.  This guidance can be taken into account in other court cases including in Scotland and Northern Ireland, by the Financial Ombudsman Service and by the FCA in looking at whether insurers are handling claims fairly.

The test case is not intended to encompass all possible disputes, but is meant to resolve some key contractual uncertainties in order to provide clarity for policyholders and insurers.  It will not determine how much is payable under individual policies, but it will provide the basis for doing so.

Further information on the test case can be found here. Policyholders with relevant non-damage BI cover may wish to subscribe for email updates from the FCA which can be done on the FCA’s webpage for the test case (via the above link).

Our COVID-19 Hub contains a range of information and resources to best support our clients during this difficult time. To receive the latest news and insights by email sign-up here.

Tagged COVID-19
Next article in series

23 Dec 2020

Brexit and VAT: What’s changing?